What’s not to love about covalent inhibitors? Well,
unfortunately, quite a bit when you start thinking about it. Reversible
inhibitors offer an extra layer of subtlety, they are tuneable, time-dependent and can modulate individual functions of
proteins or biological systems by using several inhibitors in combination. That is as
long as you can make them potent and selective enough; covalent inhibitors tend
to solve the first problem in spades, once you make your covalent bond it’s
staying there usually knocking out the enzyme target. Yet the greatest strength
is the greatest weakness, unfortunately by improving the potency of your
compounds the problems with selectivity are multiplied. If your covalent
inhibitor goes to the wrong protein first well tough; this great if you’re a
beta-lactam antibiotic trying to kill a bacterium, but killing things isn't what tool compounds are for.
But what if you could make a reversible covalent inhibitor?
Potentially you could gain the potency and, if well designed, the selectivity
as well. Maybe this would still be difficult to incorporate into a drug, but as
a basis for a sophisticated tool compound it could be extremely useful. Taunten et.al. have developed such a system that targets the amino acid cysteine.
After several test experiments they found cyanoacrylamides
to be the most reliable substrates, for there reactivity and reversibility,
against mercaptoethanol and other simple thiols. They then developed several
potential inhibitors against RSK2 (ribosomal kinase 2) based around a known
kinase inhibitor. The aim being that one of the cyanoacrylamide inhibitors would
bond covalently to nearby Cys-436. After profiling many different kinases (442
of them) only 6 showed greater than 70% inhibition. Of those 6 the top
inhibitor targeted RSK2 with at least an 80-fold higher affinity and usually
greater than 400; that’s pretty impressive selectivity for a kinase inhibitor
and they were able to crystalise the molecule within the protein to gain
further insights into its binding mode. Several control experiments were also
performed to ensure that it was the presence of a cysteine that was conferring
the potency and selectivity. Interestingly they noted that bonding of their
inhibitor caused the protein to denature and this seemed to encourage inhibitor
release however there were problems with permanent covalent bonds forming to
highly reactive cysteines on other proteins.
I really like this idea, it explores the possibilities of a tool compound offering the potential to create selective and highly potent compounds with the benefits of the traditional small-molecule inhibitor, while at the same time remaining sensibly drug-like. I think covalent inhibitors are an
under explored area and that a reversible covalent inhibitor gets rid of lots
of the objections to pure covalent inhibitors (even though are some clinical candidates and others have been phenomenally successful). But part of me also thinks this is yet another concept for targeting protein kinases. I hope the authors manage to get it to work for other protein targets as well especially ones that are currently under explored. Indeed the authors do hint that they want to do this in the discussion, I for one hope they are successful.
Now with fragment approach!
ReplyDeletehttp://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ja401221b